Walking out of my screening of Ryan Coogler's Sinners, I realized that more than anything else, the face of Michael B. Jordan's Stack has gotten etched into my brain. When Stack opens his mouth just before popping a cigarette, his face lights up with a high-wattage smile. This particular expression, which appears for a second, has been lingering in my mind for hours. During that brief instant, Stack - and, by extension, Jordan - looks infectiously charming and mischievous. You don't need to be told which brother, between Smoke (Jordan again) and Stack, is naughty, loose, high-spirited. The difference in their personalities is evident from their first appearance (Jordan deserves credit for an excellent performance). If Stack looks funny and relaxed, Smoke appears rigid and serious. He has no time for jokes, which is why he quickly shoots two people who try to steal from his truck. The identical twins are World War I veterans, but it's Smoke who has brought the soldier in him back from the war. Can you blame him? Smoke has always been the protector of Stack. As a child, he killed their father to defend Stack from abuse, and now, as an adult, he maintains his military demeanor to shield his brother from other threats (the story is set in the racially charged environment of America in 1932). Smoke's whole attitude exudes business. He teaches a girl how to negotiate before hiring her for a simple lookout task to protect the items in his vehicle. A few minutes later, this teaching lesson comes to life when Smoke negotiates with Grace (Li Jun Li).
That's the thing about Sinners - even the expositions here have meaning and weight. The sex education that Stack gives to Sammie the Preacher Boy (Miles Caton) helps him please a woman - a singer named Pearline (Jayme Lawson) - later. What's so wonderful about Sinners, and what separates it from a typical horror slasher, is that it has the patience to set up its characters and has the will to show us the details behind the organization of an event (in this case, the opening of a juke joint for the local Blacks). We see Stack and Smoke inspecting the property and making a deal with Hogwood (David Maldonado), the landowner. Stack teams up with Sammie and recruits a pianist named Delta Slim (Delroy Lindo), while Smoke gets Grace and Bo (Yao) to help him with the posters and other things. The characters go out on the streets and advertise and promote the juke joint. A lame horror movie wouldn't have gone into this elaborate routine. It could have even begun with the opening night to get to the carnage quickly. Coogler, though, first tells us that the real devils are none other than human beings. Hogwood says that the Ku Klux Klan is no longer active, but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that he's lying. Coogler doesn't make the whole "human beings are devils" point only figuratively, metaphorically like an "artist" who conceals his shallow ideas through ambiguities. He connects the notion to the film's story by revealing the Klan's horrific motives. We also catch a White man torturing a Black slave - or more accurately, we hear the sound of his violent deed.
Sound is the most crucial aspect of this film. Sinners, with its feet-tapping, enrapturing music, comes across as a musical that respects music. The movie opens with a folklore about a veil that breaks through soulful music, allowing the fusion of past, present, and future entities. When we hear this line again during Sammie's performance, we expect the vampires - the supernatural villains in this film - to emerge on the screen (these blood-sucking individuals are decent singers but not as talented as Sammie. Hence, they go after him. Sammie, though, doesn't let anyone corrupt or steal his art, his skill. And since he respects art and chooses it over almighty, art ultimately sets him free). But what Coogler does is immensely, extraordinarily thrilling. By combining Sammie's song with other tunes from other periods of time and by turning the joint into a place where retro instruments exist side-by-side with modern inventions (a DJ is seen working on his controller), Coogler blesses us with a euphoric scene that instantly becomes a classic. The voice that informs us about the power of great music could also be talking about the power of movies. A great film bridges the gap between people, emotions, and timelines. It connects the past to the present; it can also tell the present what its future will look like. With hefty ideas and a wildly unstable mood that swings between drama, horror, and comedy, Sinners stands in line to be the next great film. And yet, it only feels great intermittently.
A character says something about sweat mixing with sweat, which is precisely the kind of atmosphere Coogler wants to generate in the joint. Yet, despite all the sweaty bodies on the screen, Sinners isn't able to produce much heat. Coogler's depiction of perspiring figures looks studied. He gets the rhythms all right, but there are no palpable feelings. When Pearline sings and swings her body suggestively, and this image is joined with the ongoing sexual activity, you see what kind of effect Coogler is trying to achieve, but you don't emotionally respond to it. You admire the director's skill; you just don't buy what he's selling. And despite all the effort Coogler puts into giving his characters motivation and backstory, they still feel as distant as the victims of dumb slasher movies. Coogler also isn't very good with the "horror tricks." His execution is tasteful (we cut to the next scene as soon as a body rises in the air), but there is no kick. When blood starts spilling, you find yourself curiously detached and not too satisfied. Coogler doesn't go out there with the killings, probably because some of the vampires are close friends, brothers, and relatives - they are "human beings" (at best, we get a shot of two bodies screaming and burning). But then, why go into this territory? The entire portion looks like something out of a B-movie, though without the pleasures of a B-movie. And when Remmick (Jack O'Connell) starts killing time after grabbing his primary victim, he doesn't seem any different from those stupid bad guys who bore you with lengthy speeches instead of dispatching their target immediately. Coogler borrows the clichés and techniques from other films and tweaks the (sub)text to infuse them with fresh life. Yet, Sinners, as a cinematic experience, is only sporadically thrilling. It's not great; it's fine.
Final Score- [7/10]
Reviewed by - Vikas Yadav
Follow @vikasonorous on Twitter
Publisher at Midgard Times