Home TV Shows Reviews Apple TV+ ‘Disclaimer’ Episode 3 Review - The Walls Close in on Reality

Apple TV+ ‘Disclaimer’ Episode 3 Review - The Walls Close in on Reality

The episode follows Catherine Ravenscroft as she finds herself increasingly entangled in a dangerous web of personal secrets and moral ambiguity, driven by an unsettling memoir from her past.

Anjali Sharma - Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:45:57 +0100 122 Views
Add to Pocket:
Share:

By the third episode, Disclaimer establishes its unsettling atmosphere, blending slow-burn tension with psychological intrigue. The pacing in this episode shifts into a slightly higher gear, but it remains true to Alfonso Cuarón's deliberate storytelling style. While the previous episodes focused on character setup and subtle hints, this episode ups the stakes, with Catherine caught in the middle of a labyrinth of truth, manipulation, and ethical dilemmas.


The standout element here is Blanchett’s performance—unsurprisingly. She brings an impressive depth to Catherine, portraying her as simultaneously vulnerable and formidable. The unease around her past builds steadily, and you feel the layers of her professional and personal life crumble as she confronts truths she’d rather forget. By this episode, Blanchett solidifies her role not just as a lead, but as the emotional anchor for the entire show.


The episode’s visual language remains strong. There’s a starkness to the cinematography, where dim lighting and claustrophobic interiors mirror Catherine’s increasing isolation. Cuarón uses space brilliantly, emphasizing Catherine’s growing confinement within her own mind as well as the external threats closing in. It’s not a show that hands its viewers easy answers; the carefully controlled camera work requires attention to catch the smallest clues in the background, making it an immersive but demanding experience.


What’s particularly intriguing about this episode is the way it leans into ambiguity. You start questioning not just what’s happening, but what you’re seeing. The fragmented storytelling—cutting between present events, buried memories, and distorted perspectives—makes you feel as disoriented as the protagonist. It's a fine line between engrossing and frustrating, but for fans of methodical narratives, this episode will feel like a masterclass in suspenseful ambiguity.


On the downside, this episode is not without its challenges. While the slow-burn tension is gripping for those who appreciate the craft, it might feel too slow for viewers who prefer a faster narrative pace. Some subplots start to feel meandering as if they’re taking too long to connect to the larger story. It’s the kind of episode that requires patience—if you’re not fully invested in Catherine’s journey, the lack of action may feel like a lull. The overall structure of the episode could benefit from tighter pacing, particularly as the story begins to circle back on itself.


Another slight drawback is how elusive some of the supporting characters remain, even by episode three. With big names like Kevin Kline and Sacha Baron Cohen in the cast, it feels like they’re being underused at this stage in the series. Their characters haven’t been fully fleshed out yet, which might leave some viewers wanting more from these heavy hitters.


Nevertheless, what this episode does extraordinarily well is build atmosphere. The tension doesn’t explode but simmers beneath the surface, making every interaction feel loaded. It’s in the quiet conversations, the stolen glances, and the silences where the real menace of Disclaimer resides. It’s not just a mystery; it’s a psychological reckoning, and this episode turns up the heat without letting the pot boil over.


The moral questions raised in this episode are particularly poignant. Catherine is not a straightforward hero. She’s layered and flawed, and as you learn more about her past, you’re left to decide whether she’s a victim, a perpetrator, or something in between. This complexity is what makes the episode so engaging—it doesn’t spoon-feed you. Instead, it invites you to wrestle with the ambiguities of guilt, responsibility, and how people rewrite their own stories.


In conclusion, episode three of Disclaimer continues to craft an intriguing psychological puzzle. It’s not without its slow moments, and some threads remain frustratingly undeveloped, but for those who love nuanced storytelling and moral ambiguity, it’s a rewarding watch. Cuarón’s direction paired with Blanchett’s powerhouse performance makes this episode an absorbing, if sometimes heavy, experience. The payoff for the slow buildup feels imminent, and if the tension continues to build at this rate, Disclaimer could be setting the stage for a powerful climax.


Final Score- [8.5/10]

 

 

Subscribe

Get all latest content delivered to your email a few times a month.

DMCA.com Protection Status   © Copyrights MOVIESR.NET All rights reserved