‘Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man’ (2026) Netflix Movie Review - Trivial, Unmemorable Stuff

When Peaky Blinders premiered in 2013 on BBC Two, it met with enthusiastic critical acclaim, a position it held throughout its six-season run. The new film, though, clearly feels like a run-of-the-mill Netflix production.

Movies Reviews

In Tom Harper's Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man, the Nazis produce counterfeit British pound notes by exploiting Jewish concentration camp labor to collapse the United Kingdom's economy. Moreover, the German Luftwaffe drops bombs on and destroys the BSA factory in Small Heath, Birmingham. The factory incident gets a brief, sentimental nod in the end credits, while the fake money plan gives rise to a bland fascist villain named John Beckett (Tim Roth). Meaning: both of these elements are utterly disposable. If they don't leave a mark, it's because they exist solely to provide closure to Thomas Shelby (Cillian Murphy), who lives in self-imposed exile in a rural house, writing a novel. He is haunted by grief over the deaths of his brother and—more than anything—his daughter.


The world of Peaky Blinders isn't new to the supernatural. After all, it's a spirit that opens Thomas's eyes in the Season 6 finale, just as he is about to shoot himself. In The Immortal Man, we meet Kaulo (Rebecca Ferguson), a psychic and Zelda's twin sister. She breaks Thomas's exile, prompting his return to the life he left behind. With her talk of séances and spirits, Kaulo looks interesting, but, alas, her whole personality is reduced to: "she's played by Ferguson." And Ferguson, though always enchanting, is unable to elevate this thin, forgettable role. Kaulo lurks like a slippery witch, but she is nothing more than a pawn in the grand scheme of things.


That description fits almost all the characters. The Immortal Man is so single-minded in its pursuit of offering a proper farewell to Thomas that it refuses to expand or develop the ideas it introduces. Duke (Barry Keoghan), for instance, resents the fact that he was left alone by Thomas, his father. The film, however, doesn't give father and son the space to sort out their feelings through proper conversation. The gap between them is almost instantly bridged through plot-driven exchanges. We don't feel any simmering tension, so we never doubt their allegiance to each other. The film tries to make us expect that one of them might end up killing the other, but it's easy to see through the illusion.


Harper, working with writer Steven Knight, has assembled a collection of clichés, which is why a man arrogantly provokes Thomas at a bar. When Peaky Blinders premiered in 2013 on BBC Two, it met with enthusiastic critical acclaim, a position it held throughout its six-season run. The new film, though, clearly feels like a run-of-the-mill Netflix production. It seems made less for Thomas and more for the fans—and in doing so, it leaves both under a cloud of sadness. For a film with the word "immortal" in its title, this crime drama is one of the most trivial, unmemorable, lifeless things you will watch this year. It never soars; it starts collapsing almost as soon as it begins.

 

Final Score- [3/10]
Reviewed by - Vikas Yadav
Follow @vikasonorous on Twitter
Publisher at Midgard Times


Read at MOVIESR.net:‘Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man’ (2026) Netflix Movie Review - Trivial, Unmemorable Stuff


Related Posts